Corrections log

Why this page exists

The easiest thing a content site can do is edit silently: notice a mistake, quietly change it, act as though it never happened. It costs nothing technically, and it leaves the reader with no way to judge how reliable the site is — you cannot tell how often it has been wrong, or whether it corrects itself at all.

So corrections go here in public. Entries stay; nothing gets deleted from this list.

What counts as a correction

Logged: factual errors (a number, mechanism or process described wrongly), wording that could mislead, technical faults affecting whether a page works, and substantive changes to this site's own policies.

Not logged: typos, punctuation, layout tweaks, and ordinary expansion of existing content — that is a normal update, not a correction.

What the English edition inherited

The English pages went live on 2026-08-29, so their own history starts short — the entries below are all from the days around launch. They did not, however, start from a blank slate: they were written against the Chinese edition's text after its corrections had been applied, so the fixes logged there are already reflected here. That includes the ones that changed what the advice actually says rather than how it reads — dropping an unweighted risk "score" that had no data behind it, removing a suggestion to open a second account to recover a missed referral code, deleting a timing heuristic for diagnosing why verification failed, and rewriting the passage on withdrawal size and frequency that had contradicted itself.

Two site-wide changes also apply to these pages directly, because both editions share the same stylesheet and footer: the display typeface was moved to self-hosting on 2026-08-25, removing the last third-party request; and the footer disclosure line was rewritten to stop making a promise about your costs that we have no authority to make.

The full history is on the Chinese corrections log. It is in Chinese, and we would rather point you at the real record than paraphrase it into something that looks like an English original.

Log

1. 2026-08-29 · Sign-up guide / Verification keeps failing · A predicted outcome we had no source forBoth pages said that because the Terms of Use limit each user to one account, a second one would get stuck at the same gate, or would not complete verification. The terms support the one-account rule; they do not say what the platform does about a duplicate, and we had no second checkable source for the outcome we were predicting. The body text, the visible FAQ and the FAQ structured data now say the same thing: a duplicate sits outside the terms from the moment it exists, what happens to it is the platform's decision, and official support is the place to ask. Logged separately because it is the kind of claim people act on with money already in an account.
2. 2026-08-29 · Disclosure / About / Homepage footer · "Two pages" was ambiguous across three editionsEach language edition has its own two pages carrying a referral link, six across the site. The disclosure page opened by saying "two pages on this site", which reads as two in total. All three editions now count per edition and say so explicitly.
3. 2026-08-29 · Fees / Cash in & out / Withdrawal networks · Correction notes moved off the articlesThree passages carried their own revision history in the body text — what an earlier version said, and why it was changed. Admitting a change in public is right, but this page is where that record belongs; in the middle of an article it just dilutes the point the paragraph is making. The articles now carry the current answer only, and the changes are recorded here.
4. 2026-08-29 · Site-wide · Search snippets shortenedMost titles and meta descriptions on the English pages were long enough to be cut off in search results, one of them at over 400 characters. They were rewritten to fit, keeping whole sentences rather than trimming to a character count.
5. 2026-08-29 · Site-wide · English edition publishedThe English edition went live with the same structure as the Chinese one: fourteen articles, five browser tools, and the compliance pages. It is not a translation. Where the practical answer depends on region — payment rails, on-ramp availability, what a blocked payment method actually means — the English pages were written for readers those Chinese pages were not addressing, and they say different things in those places on purpose. Both editions are cross-linked with hreflang, and neither is treated as the source of truth for the other.

How to tell us

If you find something wrong, email us through the contact page. The most useful reports contain three things: which page, which sentence, and what you think the correct version is. A checkable source makes it better.

Confirmed corrections get added to the list above with a date. The full editorial process is on the editorial policy page.